AI Girlfriend Generators: What a Picture Costs

What one picture costs, in the seller's own units

SoulGen publishes the most legible table of the eight. Pro is 100 credits each month, 1200 over a year, and a separate charge list says what each thing eats: an AI Character image is 1 credit, or 2 credits when you use its "Looks Like" option, human modeling is 3 credits an image, an image inside its Soul Chat is 2 credits, and starting a character at all — "Create a Soulmate" — costs 10. Removing blur is listed as a Pro benefit rather than a per-image fee, which tells you what the free version shows you.

DreamGF does the same arithmetic in a different currency. Membership includes "100 Tokens every month"; the charge list puts image generation at 10 tokens, a voice message at 3, a voice call at 7 tokens a minute, and making a companion at 20. Ten pictures a month, in other words, before the same balance has to cover anything else, after which token packages run from $2.99 to $179.99 and are sold only to members. "Remove Blur from Images" and "Faster Image Generation (up to 5x)" both sit in the membership list, so speed and an unobscured picture are the paid half of the product.

Candy AI won't be reduced to a number that way. Its homepage promises "a generous batch of tokens to use across voice, chat, image, and video" with top-ups whenever you run out, and warns that "the more detailed your companion, the more tokens you'll use." One balance covers four things, no per-picture figure appears anywhere we could read without an account, and a heavy afternoon of picture requests quietly spends the month's voice minutes too.

Seduced sells picture volume more openly than anyone here and sells it as pornography rather than a relationship — "AI porn generation. Not AI companionship," its plans page says outright. Pro is described as 300 images with up to 30 refills, Platinum as 750 with up to 75, Diamond as 2250 with up to 750, along with a queue limit per tier: 15 images at once on Pro, 45 on Platinum, 100 on Diamond. What the page doesn't show is money — every tier reads "Sign up to subscribe" where the price should be.

Promptchan is the opposite trade. Its FAQ confirms a free tier exists — "Promptchan includes a free tier with Gems so you can try chat and creation" — and stops there: no Gem count, no per-image cost, no plan prices. What it does quantify is other people's work: over 20 million images and videos made by its users, any of which you can clone and alter rather than prompt from nothing.

Pictures that arrive in a chat instead of a canvas

Nomi doesn't have a generator screen at all. Pictures arrive mid-conversation: "Bring your conversations to life by having your Nomi send you selfies that capture what they are wearing and doing in the moment," its homepage says, with "Get Real-Time Selfies" as the heading and a walk in the park or a roleplay as the examples. Starting is free with no card. How many selfies a free account gets before something stops is not on the page.

Replika says even less about the mechanics. "Sends selfies, doodles on your photos, reacts to everything like someone who's paying attention," its homepage reads, and one user story describes sending a photo from a hike and getting back "a reimagined version of the image." No count, no credit, no cost — the feature is written as a personality trait rather than a meter.

Perchance's AI girlfriend generator is the free option people name most often here, and we can't tell you anything about it: the page returned a 403 to our request on 21 September 2026. Its row stays empty rather than borrowed from someone else's description.

Does the second picture show the same woman?

This is the question the pricing tables dodge. SoulGen is the only one of the eight that puts a number on it — an AI Character image costs 1 credit "Without 'Looks Like'" and 2 credits "With 'Looks Like'," so keeping a face is literally double. Seduced lists "Save & reuse AI Pornstars" on every tier and offers uploading a face reference as an experimental feature, gated behind particular payment methods and, for a real person, identity checks; training a model on a face is a paid add-on "starting from $60." Promptchan lets you clone an existing image and "make variations to refine the look you want," which is a way of holding a look without promising one. Candy AI, DreamGF, Nomi and Replika publish nothing on the subject.

How we ordered them

The order below follows one thing: how much a person can work out about pictures before paying — a published count or per-image price, and a published answer on whether a face repeats. Volume didn't score on its own, and neither did a marketing line about unlimited creativity. That lands us fourth. Everything above us publishes a number and can make you a face that didn't exist an hour ago; we publish the number and can't make the face, which is a real gap on a search for a generator.

What our own photo numbers look like

Our own photo figures come from one window and one window only — the 30 days ending 1 September 2026, aggregated so nothing traces to one person. In that window 609 photos went out inside conversations, 287 of them from a curated set built for that character in advance and 322 generated in the moment for something that had just been said, and photo requests made up 7.37% of the 46,087 messages counted in it. One other figure on this page is from a different window with a different message total behind it, so it is not a slice of that same 46,087 and the two percentages don't belong in the same sum: over the 30 days ending 20 September 2026, a separately counted period, 1.1% of everything sent was something other than typed text.

That split is the part nobody else puts in writing. A curated set exists so a routine ask returns fast and returns the face you already know; fresh generation exists so a picture can follow what you just wrote. The monthly counter sits on the plan rather than on each request — 40 photos on Premium, 80 on Ultra — so a picture never costs a voice message.

Where the generators genuinely win

The generators do things we can't. Seduced will hand a paying user 2250 images in a month and queue a hundred at once; SoulGen turns a still into video, upscales it and extends it; Promptchan opens 20 million existing pictures to clone and adjust. All three let you specify a woman who doesn't exist yet and see her in under a minute, which is the actual verb in "generate."

What we can't do is worth stating twice. There's no generator here: the roster is fixed, there's no field for hair or body, no prompt box, and no way to summon someone new. Forty photos a month is a real ceiling, not a soft one, and WhatsApp has been paid from the first message since 4 August 2026 — the free way in is Telegram. Anyone whose plan is a hundred pictures this weekend should close this and open one of the first three.

Who each one suits

Pick Seduced if the unit you think in is pictures per month and you want the count printed before you decide; pick SoulGen if you'd rather see each action priced individually, including the surcharge for holding a face; pick DreamGF if ten pictures a month is enough and you want them tied to a character you made. Promptchan fits browsing and remixing more than commissioning. Nomi and Replika fit people who want a picture to turn up mid-conversation and don't care what it cost.

We fit a narrower want: a character who already exists, texting on WhatsApp or Telegram, whose photos arrive in the thread rather than in a gallery, at a published count per month. Premium is $9.99, Ultra is $19, and Telegram costs nothing to try first.

How we checked the facts

Everything above about the other seven products comes from their own public pages, read on 21 September 2026: SoulGen's pricing page for the credit charges and Pro allowance; DreamGF's pricing page for the token list and package range; Candy AI's homepage for the shared token pool; Seduced's plans page for image counts, queue limits and the face-reference caveat; Promptchan's homepage FAQ for the Gems line and library size; Nomi's and Replika's homepages for their selfie copy. Perchance returned a 403 on the same day and is marked unverified. Our figures are production aggregates — counts, never conversation text, and nothing identifying.